Welcome Guest
Login Register

ESSEN Patent & Trademark Office Taiwan R.O.C.

Court Orders IPR Payout Increase


Posted by: ESSEN Patent & Trademark Office
Practice Area: Patent    Country: China    Publish Date: 26-Aug-2009

The number of intellectual property right (IPR) claims in Chinese courts grew by more than 30 percent last year. This included patent, trademark, and copyright infringements about everything from domain names, to pirated DVDs and fake designer clothing. But evidence of the financial loss incurred is difficult to produce, and victims are often
under-compensated as a result. The Supreme People's Court (SPC) sought to address this issue when it strengthened guidelines on compensation and directed courts to adopt "flexible and practical methods" in calculating damages.

"When it is difficult to calculate the exact amount of loss, but there is evidence proving that the amount should be much higher than the highest statutory amount, courts should award an amount higher than that level," the document stated. Compensation for victims is currently capped at 500,000 yuan. Under a law passed last December, this amount will be increased to 1 million yuan from October.

The strengthened guidelines also gave legal representatives of foreign plaintiffs the right to sign documents on behalf of their client. Previously, foreign plaintiffs were required to be in the country during proceedings because they were required to sign any documents. "Courts should not demand that a rights owner who lives overseas personally sign the statement of claim," it stated.

Last year, Chinese courts concluded 27,876 intellectual property right infringement cases. This was an increase of 32.58 percent on the year before, according to a report by Chief Justice Wang Shengjun.

In one recent matter, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court ordered three Chinese automakers to pay 20 million yuan compensation and 1.16 million yuan in legal costs to German auto company Neoplan on February 4, 2009. The court said the A9 coach produced by the Zhongwei Passenger Bus Company and Zhongda Industrial Group China was essentially the same as the Neoplan Starliner. The companies were ordered to stop producing the A9 and Beijing Zhongtong Xinghua Auto Sales Company was ordered to stop sales of the vehicle. (Source: SIPO 2009-04-24)

Related Newsletters
TitlePractice AreaCountryPosted DateViews
The Combination of Prior Arts and Other Technology Is Within the Scope of Inventive Step PatentTaiwan R.O.C. 19-Aug-2009 2145
China Moves PatentChina 26-Aug-2009 2142
Harley- Davidson Revs Up IPR Protection TrademarkChina 26-Aug-2009 5077
France's Schneider Pays 157.5 Million Yuan to Chinese Firm as Compromise PatentChina 26-Aug-2009 2265
Court Orders IPR Payout Increase PatentChina 26-Aug-2009 2215
TIPO Establishes Taiwan’s First National Accelerated Examination Program PatentTaiwan R.O.C. 26-Aug-2009 2991
“Shanzhai” Culture Now in Crosshairs TrademarkChina 26-Aug-2009 2993
Panasonic Enforces Trademark in Fujian TrademarkChina 26-Aug-2009 2592
WIPO: China's IPR Protection Progress Encourages World TrademarkChina 26-Aug-2009 3855
Chinese trademark authorities rejected Japanese city name applications TrademarkChina 26-Aug-2009 2726
12345678910...


Invite Friends/Associates to View this Newsletter
Your Name:
E-mail Address(es)
(one email per line):